New Tax Deduction Might Favor Life Agents Over Retirement Advisors
August 13, 2018 by Allison Bell
The details are hazy, and the final outcome is uncertain, but the Internal Revenue Service may make the new, 20% “pass-through deduction” more generous for insurance agents who sell products such as life insurance, disability insurance, voluntary benefits and property-casualty insurance than for financial professionals who classify themselves as “wealth planners” or “retirement planners.”
IRS officials have raised that possibility in a new draft of proposed regulations for part of the new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the “qualified business income” (QBI) deduction provision.
The QBI deduction part of the new tax act added Section 199A to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).
Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor.
IRC Section 199A creates a complicated 20% business income deduction for owners, or part owners, of the kinds of business that small business owners typically own: sole proprietorships, partnerships, S corporations, limited liability corporations and limited liability partnerships.
The deduction is set to last from the 2018 “taxable year” through 2025.
IRC Section 199A could lead to a financial professional stampede to tax advisor offices, because the section sets much tougher rules for owners of “specified service, trade or business” (SSTB) firms than for than for owners of other types of businesses.
If the final regulations look something like the new draft regulations, financial professionals may suddenly have a strong financial incentive to identify themselves as something other than a financial advisor, a retirement planner, or an actuary.
SSTB Maze
Eligible taxpayers are supposed to apply the 20% deduction to either their eligible business income (“qualified business income”) or to 20% their overall taxable income, minus capital gains — whichever calculation produces the smaller number.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act drafters reportedly wanted to give business owners a tax break, but they also wanted to avoid giving the impression they were creating a loophole to help rich people.
Drafters added a number of limitations to use of the deduction.
One limitation that directly affects financial professionals is a cap on use of the deduction by owners of SSTB firms.
For the owner of an SSTB firm, the deduction starts to phase out when the owner’s overall taxable income reaches a “threshold amount,” and goes away entirely when overall income gets too higher.
The “phase-in range” limits will be adjusted for inflation.
The range will start out at $157,500 to $207,500 for a single filer, and at $315,000 to $415,000 for a married couple filing jointly.
Tax law drafters defined an SSTB firm as “any trade or business” described in IRC Section 1202(e)(3)(A) (applied without regard to the words ‘engineering, architecture,’)” or “which involves the performance of services that consist of investing and investment management, trading, or dealing in securities (as defined in [IRC] Section 475(c)(2)), partnership interests, or commodities (as defined in section 475(e)(2)).”
IRC Section 1202(e)(3)(A) states that other tax provisions for “certain activities” apply to “any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees.”
The next section, IRC Section 1202(e)(3)(B) defines a class of businesses that includes “any banking, insurance, financing, leasing, investing or similar business.”
In the new draft regulations, IRS officials say they believe the tax law drafters meant to apply the SSTB business income deduction limits only to the kinds of professionals described in Section 1202(e)(3)(A), such as lawyers and actuaries, and not to people involved in insurance.
In an introduction to the draft regulations, IRS officials describe their approach this way:
[The draft limits the ] definition of financial services to services typically performed by financial advisors and investment bankers and provides that the field of financial services includes the provision of financial services to clients including managing wealth, advising clients with respect to finances, developing retirement plans, developing wealth transition plans, the provision of advisory and other similar services regarding valuations, mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings … , and raising financial capital by underwriting, or acting as the client’s agent in the issuance of securities, and similar services. This includes services provided by financial advisors, investment bankers, wealth planners, and retirement advisors and other similar professionals, but does not include taking deposits or making loans.”
David Kamin, a tax law professor at New York University, talked about the SSTB definition at a Senate Finance Committee hearing in April.
He took note of congressional Joint Committee on Taxation projections that about half of the tax savings resulting from IRC Section 199A may go to taxpayers earnings over $1 million per year.
The provision also “draws very, very haphazard lines in the sand as to who gets [the deduction] and who doesn’t,” Kamin said.
‘Reputation or Skill’
Some commenters have told the IRS that they worry that almost any business could be said to depend on the skills and reputation of its owners and employees.
IRS officials have proposed defining that provision narrowly, to refer only to well-known personalities, such famous athletes or actors, who can get paid to endorse products, or get income from activities such as licensing the rights to the use of their names.
Resources
The IRS is preparing to publish the draft IRC Section 199A regulations in the Federal Register, an official government publication, Thursday.
A preview copy of the draft is available here.
Comments will be due 45 days after the official publication date.
The IRS contact people for the content of the draft are Vishal Amin, Frank Fisher, Wendy Kribell and Adrienne Mikolashek.
The IRS contact person for submission of public comments, and for any public hearing to be held on the draft, is Regina Johnson.
A video of the Senate Finance Committee hearing on the new tax law, which includes some discussion of the IRC Section 199A pass-through provision, is available here.
Industry Group Action
The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA) has already been working on the SSTB definition issue together with the Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers (CIAB) and the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America (IIABA).
In May, the House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing on tax reform and small businesses. The committee asked members of the public for comments.
IIABA, CIAB and IIABA sent a joint letter asking Congress to make sure that the IRS excludes insurance agents from the SSTB definition.
The groups told Congress that confusion about the definition has already been causing confusing for agents who have been trying to calculate their quarterly estimated tax payments.
“Our member firms are not the type of businesses that Congress intended to exclude from receiving the full benefits of Section 199A,” the groups argue in their letter “Excluding our member firms from receiving the full benefits Section 199A would be contrary to Congress’ broad public policy goals of growing the economy and creating jobs, and — as with any policy development that increases the cost of doing business — would ultimately be detrimental to consumers of vital insurance products.”
NAIFA has posted a copy of the letter here.
NAIFA believes the new draft regulations would exclude insurance agents and brokers from the SSTB definition while including investment-advice and management businesses, including retirement planning businesses, in the SSTB definition, according to a NAIFA commentary posted Friday.
Kevin Mayeux, NAIFA’s chief executive officer, said in a comment that he sees the language in the draft regulations as a “big win for NAIFA.”
“This goes hand-in-glove with our work with the administration and Congress to ensure tax reform made no changes to the taxation of life insurance and annuity products, protecting advisors and their clients from proposals that could have threatened Americans’ financial security,” Mayeux said.
The Future
One question will be what happens to financial professionals who sell insurance products, such as variable annuities and variable life policies, that are regulated as securities. Although the IRS SSTB definition appears to exclude insurance agents, it includes businesses that sell securities.
