We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • New Accounting Rules to Put Life Insurers on GAAP Reporting Rollercoaster

    August 21, 2018 by Allison Bell

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has completed new accounting rules that could give the public a better idea about what’s really going on inside life insurance companies, and, possibly, knock more insurance and annuity products off of financial professionals’ shelves.

    FASB has published those new standards in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12 — Financial Services — Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts.

    The standards, which are based on a draft released in September 2016, will affect any life insurer financial reports prepared using U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor. 

    The ASU 2018-12 drafters say they want to give investors timely information about what’s really happening to the projected value of the long-term benefits and guarantees insurers have sold.

    Life insurance company representatives have argued that the new financial reports could scare investors away from the life insurance sector, and that complying with the rules will be difficult.

    What’s FASB?

    FASB is a Norwalk, Connecticut-based organization that manages the GAAP accounting standards.

    U.S. GAAP rules have the most direct effect on U.S. companies that have sold stock to “public investors,” or ordinary investors. Publicly traded companies use GAAP rules when reporting on their performance to public investors.

    The FASB changes will not have a direct effect on state insurance regulators’ own Statutory Accounting Principles.

    But life insurers that are not public companies, such as policyholder-owned mutual life insurers, may prepare GAAP financial statements when they are communicating with lenders, or with potential buyers, or for other purposes.

    That means the new FASB rules will have the most dramatic effect on the kinds of life insurers with shares that trade on the New York Stock Exchange, but that the rules could also have some effect on other life insurers.

    What Products Are Affected?

    The new GAAP standards will apply to U.S. insurers that offer universal life policies, participating life policies, whole life policies and term life policies, and to several related types of products: long-term care benefits, earnings protection benefits, and universal disability contracts, according to the ASU 2018-12 text.

    The new GAAP standards will also apply to a variety of annuity product features, such as variable annuity minimum guaranteed death benefits, guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits, and guaranteed minimum income benefits.

    What Does ASU 2018-12 Require?

    The new ASU 2018-12 rules require an affected insurer to:

    • Update the projected value of insurance benefits and guarantee liabilities at least once per year, by updating the assumptions used to create the projections.
    • Use a standardized discount rate, or interest-rate-like figure, rather than its own, homegrown yield estimate, to create the liability value projections.
    • Include the change in the value of benefits and guarantee liabilities in net income.
    • Adopt a new reporting category for “market risk benefits,” or contract provisions, such as index annuity guarantees or variable life guarantees, through which an insurer protects the consumer from capital market risk by assuming the capital market risk itself, and apply “fair value” rules for measuring the value of those benefits.
    • Give more information about the methods it uses to measure liabilities, and to make and change assumptions.

    The rules won’t change how life insurers’ blocks of business are really doing.

    But, if life insurers sold some of the business, such as universal life insurance, back when insurers’ investment yields were much higher than they are today, and the life insurers have not updated the interest rate assumptions used to value those liabilities, the new rules could lead to big increases in the reported value of the liabilities related to those blocks of business.

    Pros and Cons

    FASB Chairman Russell Golden said in a statement that the new update will provide investors and other financial statement users with better and more timely and transparent information about long-term contracts issued by insurers.

    “Featuring targeted improvements to the current reporting model for these contracts, it reflects the input we received from diverse insurance industry stakeholders over more than 10 years of extensive outreach,” Golden said.

    FASB says it has spent 10 years developing the standards, and that it held more than 150 meetings with financial statement users; 250 meetings with preparers, auditors, industry groups and others; and 13 group meetings with 60 users.

    FASB said it also participated in 14 conferences with more than 150 users, and 13 public round table discussions, and that it reviewed about 450 comment letters.

    Insurance companies and insurance groups contacted say are still reading the final version of ASU 2018-12.

    But, in April, representatives from Lincoln National Corp. and Prudential Financial wrote in a joint comment letter that they believed the thinking reflected in the September 2016 draft would increase financial statement volatility without improving the comparability of insurers’ results.

    Lincoln and Prudential said they conducted a survey of 80 users of insurance company financial statements, including asset managers and financial analysts. The companies said they received about 40 completed survey forms.

    “While volatility is appropriate if it reflects the underlying economics of the business, accounting volatility that is not reflective of the economics can be misleading, misinterpreted, and less transparent,” the insurer reps wrote in the April letter.

    About 80% of the insurance financial statement users who participated in the Lincoln-Prudential survey said that, if the new FASB long-duration contract rules took effect, they would rely more on non-GAAP measures and other financial metrics to assess companies’ performance, according to Lincoln and Prudential.

    “The proposals are also likely to reduce the amount of capital invested in the life insurance industry, as one-third of survey participants indicated they would be less likely to commit capital to the life insurance industry, given the elevated volatility,” the Lincoln and Prudential reps told FASB.

    Life insurers have already been backing away from offering some popular products, such as annuities with benefits guarantees, due to concerns about new accounting standards, and the new standards update could make offering products such as whole life insurance and universal life insurance more challenging for publicly traded insurers.

    Over the decade, when mutual insurers have gone public, or public companies have gone private, some analysts questioned how well publicly traded insurers could support long-duration products when times were tough.

    But analysts at Fitch Ratings recently argued in a comment on long-term care insurance (LTCI) issuers that they think better, more timely, more standardized information about issuers’ LTCI blocks would increase block buyers’ and reinsurers’ interest in LTCI deals, by giving those players’ understanding of the LTCI issuers’ liabilities.

    Timing

    FASB originally proposed giving publicly traded life insurers two years to begin applying the new rules to their financial statements.

    The American Council of Life Insurers asked FASB to give life insurers four years to comply.

    FASB rejected the ACLI’s request: It says the new standards will start applying to publicly traded life insurers for fiscal years, and for quarters or other interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after Dec. 15, 2020.

    For other entities, the standards will take effect for fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2021, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2022.

    Resources

    FASB has posted a collection of documents related to the new accounting standards here.

    The underlying text of ASU 2018-12 is available here.

    Public comments on the standards are available here.

    UPDATE: Post-Publication Statement

    After the original version of this article came out, Jim Kroeker, FASB’s vice chairman, gave ThinkAdvisor Life/Health a statement that may reflect willingness on FASB’s part to adjust the update if the update appears to be difficult to implement.

    “The new standard is intended to provide investors and other financial statement users with more timely, transparent information about long-duration contracts issued by insurance companies,” Kroeker said in the statement. “Throughout the process of developing the standard, the FASB made a number of improvements based on industry feedback, and we stand ready to support a successful transition to the new guidance by monitoring and addressing any implementation issues that may arise.”

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on August 15, 2018 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency