We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NY Department of Financial Services Issues Updated Proposal Adopting a “Best Interest” Standard for Life Insurance and Annuity Product Transactions, Including for In-Force Transactions

    June 26, 2018 by Vedder Price

    The New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) has amended its proposal to adopt a “best interest” standard for those licensed to sell life insurance policies and annuity contracts. Among other things, the proposed rule, which would amend New York’s current suitability regulation, Insurance Regulation 187 (11 NYCRR 224), would require insurance companies to establish standards and procedures for recommendations to consumers for insurance products “delivered or issued for delivery” in New York to ensure that any sales transaction is in the best interest of the consumer and “appropriately addresses the [consumer’s] insurance needs and financial objectives” at the time of the transaction.

    As currently presented, the proposal would:

    • expand the purpose of the regulation to apply to life insurance transactions—in addition to transactions in annuity contracts;

    • clarify that the duties of insurers and “insurance producers” (insurance agents or brokers) apply to life insurance recommendations, in addition to applying to annuity recommendations;

    • make any requirement applicable to a producer under the regulation applicable to every producer in the transaction who participated in the making of the recommendation and received compensation as a result of the sales transaction, regardless of the level of contact made with the consumer;

    • broaden the applicability of the regulation so that, in addition to sales transactions, it would cover any modification or election of a contractual provision with respect to an in-force policy that does not generate 12 Investment Services Regulatory Update | June 2018 new sales compensation;

    • prohibit stating or implying that a recommendation to enter into a sales transaction or an in-force transaction is “financial planning, comprehensive financial advice, investment management or related services” in the absence of a specific certification or professional designation, with proper licensing, as applicable; and

    • require an insurer to establish, maintain and audit a system of supervision that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the amended regulation; establish and maintain procedures to prevent financial exploitation and abuse; provide any policy information reasonably requested by a consumer regarding the consumer’s in-force policy; provide comparison information showing differences between fee-based and commission-based versions of a product; and provide relevant policy information.

    Standard of Conduct

    The existing standard of conduct in New York requires that there be “reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable for the consumer on the basis of the facts disclosed by the consumer as to the consumer’s investments and other insurance policies or contracts and as to the consumer’s financial situation and needs, including the consumer’s suitability information.”

    The proposed amendment would provide for a best interest standard of care for all sales of life insurance and annuity products, applicable to recommendations made both prior to sale of an insurance product and, notably, during the servicing of the product. For sales transactions, the best interest standard would require that the recommendation to the consumer be “based on an evaluation of the relevant suitability information and reflects the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use under the circumstances.”

    Additionally, the new standard would require that (1) the sales transaction be suitable, and (2) there be a reasonable basis for believing that the consumer has been reasonably informed of various features of the product and “potential consequences of the sales transaction, both favorable and unfavorable, such as the potential surrender period and surrender charge, any secondary guarantee period, equity-index features, availability of cash value, potential tax implications . . . policy exclusions or restrictions . . . any differences in features among fee-based and commission-based versions of the policy and the manner in which the producer is compensated for the sale and servicing of the policy… ”

    The proposed amendment would add a new section to the regulation to incorporate a best interest standard on in-force transactions. As a result, the insurance agent or broker (i.e., a producer), or insurer where no producer is involved, would be required, among other things, to have a reasonable basis for believing that the consumer has been reasonably informed of the relevant features of the policy and potential consequences of the in-force transaction, both favorable and unfavorable. In addition, an insurance producer would be prohibited from making a recommendation to a consumer to enter into an in-force transaction about which the producer has inadequate knowledge.

    Procedures to Prevent Financial Exploitation and Abuse

    The amended regulation would require insurers to establish and maintain procedures designed to prevent “financial exploitation and abuse.” The proposal defines financial exploitation and abuse as the improper use of an adult’s funds, property or resources by another individual and includes fraud, false pretenses, embezzlement, conspiracy, forgery, falsifying records, coerced property transfers or the denial of access to assets. The amended regulation was published in the New York State Register on May 16, 2018, and the public comment period closed on June 15, 2018.

    The text of the proposed regulation is available at: https://www.dfs.ny.gov/insurance/rproindx.htm

    A press release issued by DFS regarding the proposal is available at: https://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1804271.htm

    Originally Posted at The National Law Review on June 26, 2018 by Vedder Price.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency