We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 5 Reasons Genworth’s Would-Be Buyer Could Still Close the Deal

    September 6, 2017 by Allison Bell

    Regulators in China have come out with tough new corporate acquisition rules in recent weeks. Officials there want to block irrational deals, and deals involving controversial activities that could hurt people in other countries, and, possibly, make China look bad.

    The new rules could create turbulence for Genworth Financial Inc.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor. 

    Genworth is the Richmond, Virginia-based mortgage insurer and life insurer formed from General Electric Company’s old insurance company subsidiaries.

    Genworth is still one of the most active players in the mortgage insurance market in the United States, Canada and Australia.

    The company has stopped selling new life and annuity products, but it has large amounts of life and annuity business on its books, including in-force life insurance with a total of $639 billion in death benefits, and annuities with about $23 billion in total account value.

    The company is still selling new long-term care insurance, and it generated $623 million in net earned LTCI premium revenue in the second quarter.

    Genworth has been facing severe pressure on the performance of its LTCI block as a result of low interest rates, inaccurate assumptions about policyholder behavior, and the effects of a belief common in the 1980s and 1990s that premiums for in-force LTCI should never increase.

    China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co. Ltd., a large real estate developer based in Beijing, agreed in October to acquire Genworth for $2.7 billion, and to contribute $525 million in cash to shore up the in-force U.S. LTCI operations.

    Genworth and China Oceanwide disclosed Aug. 21, in a document filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that they have pushed the completion deadline for their deal back to Nov. 30, from Sept. 1. The companies said they also have agreed to free China Oceanwide from having to pay a deal termination fee if the deal falls through because of a decision by regulators in China. The summary of the new agreement does not appear to refer directly to U.S. insurance regulators.

    The China Oceanwide-Genworth appears to be different from some of the “irrational” deals that have concerned regulators in China, however, and those differences could increase the odds that this deal will really close.

    Here’s a look at five factors that may be working in favor of completion of this deal, based in part on an analysis of the deal prepared by a team at Hong Kong-based Orient Capital Research in November, and in part on a China Oceanwide preliminary senior notes offering memorandum dated July 10. The memorandum is marked “strictly confidential,” but at least four organizations have posted copies of the memorandum on the web.

    1. For Chinese real estate developers, acquiring a non-Chinese insurers is a good way to get access to low-cost capital.

    The Orient Capital analysts write that real estate development companies in China have been facing tight constraints on capital.

     

    For companies in China, getting into the insurance business looks like a good way to eventually get access to low-cost sources of capital, the analysts write.

    2. China acquirers now see selling new insurance products as a better way to raise money than using an industrial company serve as collateral for bank loans.

    For now, Genworth’s relatively low ratings, and questions about the future of its long-term care insurance business, are limiting its sales.

    For a Chinese buyer, one popular strategy is to acquire an underperforming insurer, strengthen the insurer, and increase the insurer’s sales. Issuing new insurance products is a much more efficient way to bring in cash than using a business as bank loan collateral, according to the Orient Capital Research analysts.

    3. The Chinese government is experimenting with a long-term care insurance pilot program and wants to know more about how LTCI works.

    China has a rapidly aging population, with just one child responsible for caring for two parents in many families. The Chinese government has been sending representatives to U.S. long-term care insurance conferences to learn about the U.S. commercial LTCI market for years.

    In July, China’s Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the country’s equivalent of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, set up an LTCI pilot program aimed at workers with basic government-provided major medical coverage.

    In June, Li Keqiang, the economist who runs the State Council of the People’s Republic China, said at a council meeting in June that one priority for China is developing commercial insurance programs to protect older residents of China against accidental injury risk, longevity risk and the risk of needing long-term care, according to a China Government Network account posted on the ministry’s website.

    China should make sure the commercial insurance arrangements for older people are safe and reliable, and that they provide a reasonable rate of return, according to Li.

    Li’s comments suggest that officials in China may place a high value on getting advice from organizations that have operated large LTCI programs.

    4. China Oceanwide is interested in building insurance operations in China as well as in building insurance operations in the United States.

    The pending Genworth deal is just one part of China Oceanwide’s efforts in the insurance sector.

    The company’s Wuhan CBD unit acquired 51% of Asia-Pacific Property & Casualty Insurance Co. Ltd. in 2015 from an investment group. In August 2015, the company began setting up Asia-Pacific Reinsurance Holdings Co. Ltd., the first reinsurance company established with private capital in China. The reinsurer will offer life, health and accident reinsurance as well as property-casualty reinsurance, according to China Oceanwide.

    The company is also planning to start Asia-Pacific Internet Life Insurance Ltd., a company that will sell personal insurance through the Internet.

    One of the company’s directors is Zhao Xiaoxia, has been a senior vice president at New York Life Insurance Company and president of Haier New York Life Insurance Company. Several other directors have been executives at life insurers based in China.

    5. China Oceanwide managers seem to have a good ability to analyze and disclose the risks they face.

    The note offering memorandum includes a long discussion of risk factors, ranging from the possibility that the company may face problems from changes in interest rates to the possibility that negative press coverage may hurt its reputation.

    In two comments on insurance-related risk, the company acknowledges that it has a relatively short operating history in the insurance industry.

    The company also acknowledges that its assumptions about the growth of the insurance market in China may be off.

    The company has a list of advisors that includes some names familiar to U.S. investors. The list of legal advisors on the memorandum includes the Hong Kong office of Davis Polk. The auditor is an affiliate of BDO based in Shenzhen, China.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on August 25, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency