We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Critics of DOL Fiduciary Rule Push for Long Delays

    July 25, 2017 by Melanie Waddell

    Despite industry trade groups’ insistence that the Department of Labor delay the implementation date of its fiduciary rule for years, ERISA attorneys continue to recommend that advisors and broker-dealers push ahead in their compliance steps.  

    Click HERE to view the original story via ThinkAdvisor.

    The first deadline under a two-part request for information issued by Labor on June 29 expired Friday. The department sought comments on whether it should delay the fiduciary rule’s Jan. 1 compliance date. The the second part of the RFI, with a comment period ending Aug. 7, solicits feedback on 18 questions about the rule.

    The Investment Company Institute said in its comment letter that Labor “must immediately” delay the January applicability date for the “remaining elements” of the fiduciary rule, including the conditions of the Best Interest Contract Exemption (BICE) and other exemptions.

    The rule itself along with the Impartial Conduct Standards, which took effect on June 9, would continue to apply during the delay, wrote ICI Acting General Counsel Dorothy Donohue.

    Postponing the January compliance date would “reduce harm to investors and provide certainty to the industry while the agency considers additional modifications to the rule and exemptions,” Donohue wrote. Delay, she continued, will also give Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta “the needed time to coordinate fiduciary rulemaking with Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Jay Clayton — which is the most desirable way to achieve a consistent approach that puts investors’ interests first.”

    ICI’s letter urges Labor to issue an interim rule by Aug. 15 to delay the Jan. 1 BICE implementation date until Jan. 1, 2019. 

    The mutual fund trade group asked that the department “simultaneously announce” that it expects to finalize modifications to the rule and the relevant exemptions before the end of any delay period. 

    ICI also requested that Labor “declare now that these changes will not take effect until at least Jan. 1, 2020 — one year after they are finalized.”

    The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also urged Labor in its comment letter to extend the transition period for at least 18 months, from Jan. 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, or “a later date if needed.”

    Extending the transition period until June 30, 2019, or a later date “is essential for responsible rulemaking that protects the best interests of retirement investors,” Chamber said. “Similarly, providing at least a one-year transition period following any amendments to the rule is essential to orderly, efficient rulemaking.”

    The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association urged that the Jan. 1 compliance date be extended by a minimum of 24 months. “Piecemeal delays cause retirement investors confusion, uncertainty and additional cost,” SIFMA said in its comment letter. 

    Fred Reish, partner in Drinker Biddle & Reath’s employee benefits and executive compensation practice group in Los Angeles, told ThinkAdvisor on Monday that Labor will likely issue a proposed delay “in September, give or take 30 days.”

    Reish’s colleague, Joshua Waldbeser, an associate in Drinker Biddle’s Chicago office, who participated in a recent ThinkAdvisor webcast about the fiduciary rule, stated that with RFI comments in hand, “my prediction is that the DOL is going to have the ammunition it needs this time to delay the rule significantly. If I were betting, I would say that the transition period could probably be delayed by a year — could be less, could be more.”

    As Waldbeser explained on the webcast, for compliance with BICE and the rule’s other principal transaction exemptions, “the only thing you have to be doing right now during the transition period is ensuring that advice is consistent with the best interest of clients; that the compensation to the advisor, the firms are reasonable — and that’s an industry standard and not a legal one; and that there are no misleading statements being made to investors.” These are collectively known as the Impartial Conduct Standards.

    Allison Wielobob, counsel with Eversheds Sutherland, who also participated on the ThinkAdvisor webcast, stated, however, that the January compliance date will likely be “pushed out,” with “maybe some reduced compliance conditions under the BICE, but I think we’re going to keep most of it.”

    Why? Acosta “is an academic; he’s being careful … and is following the Administrative Procedures Act to the letter and being careful so that they don’t make mistakes that will come back to haunt them,” Wielobob said. 

    That said, both Wielobob and Waldbeser offered webcast participants the following fiduciary rule compliance checklist:

    • Review/assess marketing materials, training materials, investment products, conflicts of interest including third-party payments, compensation practices
    • Adopt written policies and procedures to comply with Impartial Conduct Standards
    • Designate persons to address and monitor compliance with Impartial Conduct Standards
    • Review and confirm statements by the firm about the recommended transaction, fees and compensation, material conflicts of interests, and any other matters relevant to a client’s investment decisions, are not materially misleading at the time they are made
    • Prepare statement of fiduciary status for distribution to retirement investors, if using streamlined, level fee BIC Exemption
    • Provide investment advice that is, at the time of the recommendation, in the best interest of the client
    • Provide adequate recordkeeping. Develop process for documenting rationales for investment recommendations, any other options that were considered, and why their compensation is justified 

    Begin to prepare for Jan. 1, 2018, requirements:

    • Multiple disclosure obligations, including material conflicts of interest and third-party payments
    • Designate conflicts officer
    • Best Interest Contract written contract requirement, in the case of IRAs
    • Supplemental documentation requirements for rollover recommendations
    • For PTE 84-24 compliance, develop commission information

     

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on July 24, 2017 by Melanie Waddell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency