We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • DoL moves to delay fiduciary rule by 60 days

    March 6, 2017 by Andrew Welsch

    The Department of Labor will propose delaying the applicability date of the fiduciary rule by 60 days in order to complete a review of the regulation ordered by President Trump, according to a document on the website of the Federal Register.

    The move comes as many firms have been plowing ahead with plans to comply with the regulation, originally set to take effect on April 10.

    Delaying and ultimately reversing the rule would have enormous implications for the industry. Merrill Lynch, for example, recently indicated that it could walk back aspects of its implementation strategy, including a pledge to cease offering commission-based retirement accounts.

    Fiduciary opponents hope that the proposed delay will be followed by further moves to rescind or rewrite the rule. Trump issued a memo earlier this month asking the Labor Department to review the regulation and reverse it if the department concluded that it would adversely affect investors.

    SIFMA called for the delay to be implemented “with haste,” saying that the regulation is causing firms to cease offering products as well as serving certain client accounts.

    “Delaying the rule is imperative to avoid further client confusion and market disruption, as firms approach the drop-dead date to notify tens of millions of customers of service changes to their accounts because of the rule, ultimately making retirement savings more difficult for many investors,” the trade group said in a statement.

    Advocates for a fiduciary standard have been pressing to keep the rule in the place.

    Ron Rhoades, professor and director of the Financial Planning Program at Western Kentucky University, criticizes the Trump administration’s economic analysis of a potential delay, saying that individual investors stand to lose millions.

    “Additionally, the Department of Labor took six years, and employed numerous economists, in demonstrating the tremendous benefits of the rule to individual investors, plan sponsors, and to the U.S. economy in general. The grant of 60 days will only result in the Department of Labor struggling to undo the fiduciary rulemaking which it has already clearly expressed is beneficial to Americans, and to America itself,” Rhoades says.

    The Labor Department did not respond to requests for additional comment.

    DELAY WOULD BE ‘SIGNIFICANT’

    The Labor Department’s proposed delay, which is scheduled to be published in the register on Friday, outlines a comment period of 15 days in which the public can ask questions about the department’s intent as well as Trump’s memo.

    “The extension would make it possible for the department to take additional steps (such as completing its examination, implementing any necessary additional extension(s), and proposing and implementing a revocation or revision of the rule) without the rule becoming applicable beforehand,” according to the document.

    The Office of Management and Budget completed its review of the proposal earlier this week and deemed it “economically significant.”

    “The nature and magnitude of any such delay of the effects is highly uncertain, as some variation can be expected in the pace at which firms move to comply and mitigate advisory conflicts and at which advisers respond to such mitigation and adjust their recommendations to satisfy impartial conduct standards,” the Labor Department says in its proposal.

    The delay and possible demise of the fiduciary rule comes after the regulation survived several court challenges, including a lawsuit brought by some industry trade groups. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, SIFMA, Financial Services Roundtable and Insured Retirement Institute vowed last week to appeal a federal judge’s recent ruling against their lawsuit.

    The chamber said in a statement that it welcomed the proposed delay.

    “We commend the Department of Labor for its swift action to protect retirement savers by issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking to delay the fiduciary rule, which will help ensure all Americans have access to the advice and choices needed when saving for their future,” the chamber said.

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on March 1, 2017 by Andrew Welsch.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency