We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The good news for FIAs (after the fiduciary rule)

    May 10, 2016 by Rich White

    Photo: Getty

    Photo: Getty

    The Department of Labor’s final fiduciary rule, published April 6, threw a bucket of cold water on the annuity industry’s hottest product, fixed indexed annuities.

    For 2015, LIMRA reported that sales of FIAs grew by 13 percent year-on-year to a record $54.4 billion. More than 60 percent of FIA sales are qualified – held in retirement plans or IRAs.

    FIAs put an insurance company’s guarantee behind all principal while crediting an annual interest rate linked to a market index, up to a cap. Since clients can’t lose money, regulators generally have treated FIAs the same as fixed annuities – not as registered securities products like variable annuities. When sold in retirement plan accounts, FIAs have been subject to the same PTE 84-24 exemption as guaranteed life insurance contracts and fixed annuities.

    Without notice, DOL stripped away FIAs’ PTE 84-24 exemption and replaced it with the more stringent Best Interest Contract (BIC) exemption of the new rule, putting FIAs in the same regulatory regime as variable annuities. The annuity industry was blindsided, with some companies predicting huge declines in their FIA sales, and a few threatening to exit the market.

    Here are 8 FAQs on the DOL fiduciary rule for advisors to 401(k) sponsors, from a larger fact sheet released…

    For advisors who believe in FIAs, the situation may not be as bad as all this suggests, for three reasons.

    First, even if the FIA market contracts, the product meets clients’ needs and some carriers will continue to offer attractive contracts.

    Secondly, advisors who already offer qualified variable annuities (VAs) should not be greatly disadvantaged, because the same Best Interest Contracts can cover transactions in both FIAs and VAs from the same carrier.

    Thirdly, clients usually don’t give up much tax benefit by holding non-qualified FIAs outside retirement plan accounts.

    Non-qualified FIAs are designed as long-term, tax-deferred vehicles for retirement accumulation and income. Unlike qualified FIAs, they aren’t subject to minimum distribution requirements, and income payments aren’t fully taxable. (A portion of each payment is recovered tax-free under an exclusion ratio.)

    Even if clients plan to accumulate money in an annuity for many years before income payments begin, the tax advantages of qualified FIAs aren’t always that much better.

    Example: A client changes jobs at age 50 and can transfer $100,000 from a 401(k) plan to a Traditional IRA funded by a qualified FIA. In 20 years’ time, at 6 percent interest per year, the IRA hypothetically will grow to $320,714 pre-tax or $230,914 after-tax (at 28 percent).

    Instead, suppose the client pays income tax on a $100,000 distribution and puts the balance ($72,000) into a non-qualified FIA. To have the same after-tax amount in 20 years, the FIA will need to earn an interest rate of 7.2 percent annually – 1.2 percent more than the qualified FIA. After age 70 ½, the client can continue to defer all taxes in the non-qualified FIA, while minimum distributions (or annuity payments) will be required annually from the Traditional IRA.

    If your clients like FIAs and you don’t want to put this business under a BIC exemption, start educating them now on the benefits of non-qualified annuities.

    For many, paying taxes now and investing the difference tax-deferred (for up to the rest of your life) won’t seem such a bad deal. To learn more about the tax treatment of non-qualified annuities, see IRS Publication 939.

    Originally Posted at BenefitsPro on May 10, 2016 by Rich White.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency