We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Observers Worry DOL Rule Change Could Hurt Fixed Indexed Annuities

    April 12, 2016 by Frank Klimko

    WASHINGTON – Although the new conflict-of-interest fiduciary rule adopted a broad swath of insurance industry-friendly language, trade representatives continue to harbor misgivings that the standards on fixed indexed annuities could hurt sales, reduce commissions and disrupt the annuity marketplace.

    The new FIA rules are part of the final fiduciary regulation just published by U.S. Department of Labor. Although the rule contained some concessions to the industry, it toughened the rules by adding FIAs to the Best Interest Contract Exemption, along with variable annuities. FIAs previously were covered under the old Prohibited Transaction Exemption — PTE 84-24.

    The inclusion of the FIAs in the Best Interest Contract Exemption was no surprise, said Insured Retirement Institute President and Chief Executive Officer Cathy Weatherford.

    “We have been advising our members that this was a possibility, based on our discussions with the DOL and the administration,” Weatherford told Best’s News Service. “We received some indication that the DOL would try to differentiate between conventional annuities that existed in 1984 and some of the more innovative products available to consumers today.”

    The FIA rule could cause a severe disruption for many securities brokers and dealers and may be devastating for those who sell annuities, according to the Americans for Annuity Protection CEO Kim O’Brien.

    “It will hurt the marketplace and it will hurt consumers,” O’Brien told Best’s News Service. “We had hoped for so much more from the department.”

    “FIA recommendations that involve commissions or compensation not paid directly by the customer for a level fee or through the customer’s assets will require a BICE,” O’Brien said. “This means that FIAs are treated like VAs under ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) and potentially exposes them to security regulation through re-characterization under ERISA law.”

    Arbitration is not required via the BICE, opening the door to FIA-related lawsuits, O’Brien said. She worried the new rule would conflict with licensure laws and allow uncertified agents to sell annuities and other products. O’Brien also expressed concern the new rule will change the way ERISA 401(k) plans are treated, exempting them from the BICE requirements.

    “This concession to the 401(k) marketplace creates an un-level playing field between 401(k) advisers and IRA advisers,” O’Brien said. “Favoring the 401(k) adviser at the expense of the private insurance market, limits consumer’s ability to move to portable, aggregated and self-owned IRAs.”

    With indexed annuities, a type of fixed annuity, the insurer invests most of the customer’s principal in bonds to ensure the policy will generate a small annual return but uses a small portion of the premium to buy options in a stock market index, usually the S&P 500. Options that are exercised can result in additional interest credited to a policy, potentially more than an investor might achieve through other fixed-income investments.

    Any impact on sales won’t happen immediately, Jamie N. Johnson, communications specialist at Wink and Moore Market Intelligence, told Best’s News Service.

    “We aren’t anticipating sales declining until the rule goes into effect in January 2018,” Johnson said. “There will be more administration, more forms, and more disclosure to annuity purchasers; because of this, there will probably be a decline in indexed annuities.”

    “In the meantime, we are anticipating that indexed annuity sales are going to continue to do well because interest rates are so low,” Johnson said.

    The indexed annuities market was robust last year. Allianz in 2015 led the industry, with $8.75 billion; followed by American Equity Investment Life ($6.79 billion) and in third, Great American ($3.69 billion), according to year-end figures compiled by Limra’s Secure Retirement Institute. The institute said it has observed a number of companies, which have traditionally been strong in the variable annuity market, now increasing their attention on the indexed annuity market (Best’s News Service, March 18, 2016).

    (By Frank Klimko, Washington correspondent, BestWeek: Frank.Klimko@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at AM Best on April 11, 2016 by Frank Klimko.

    Categories: Wink's Articles
    currency