We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Do’s and Don’ts of Index Annuities: Opinion

    March 1, 2016 by Scott Stolz, Senior Vice President Raymond James

    There’s a proper way to discuss these popular products

    Beacon Research recently reported that fixed index annuity sales hit a record $14.4 billion in the third quarter of 2015, up 14.5% versus the previous quarter. While this is still well below the $32 billion in variable annuity sales that Morningstar reported for the same quarter, the industry is taking note that index annuity sales continue to grow, while variable annuity sales drift downward. Morningstar calculates that variable annuity sales dropped 10% quarter over quarter. The increased sales in index annuities is partly due to more consumer friendly product designs that have made the product more acceptable to broker-dealers and banks, and partly due to demographic trends that are making the product more appealing to baby boomers, who continue to put increasing value in the return of their money versus the return on their money.

    Generally, when a financial product of any kind experiences significant growth, it is not uncommon for the product to be misunderstood or incorrectly positioned. In hopes of keeping that from happening, I have outlined my Do’s and Don’ts when recommending index annuities as a potential solution for your clients. While each investor’s financial situation is different, below are some general guidelines you can consider when discussing these products.

    1. Don’t suggest that an index annuity is an alternative to equity investments. Do suggest that the product is designed as a potential alternative to investments designed to protect capital.

    If your client maintains a 60/40 equity/fixed income portfolio, the index annuity fits into the 40% fixed income portion. It does not belong in the 60% equity portion and should NEVER be described as if it gives the client the upside (or even most of the upside) of the equity markets without the downside. Ultimately, an index annuity is a fixed annuity with an uncertain rate of interest each year. In exchange for giving up a guaranteed return, the client should get, on average, 1%–2% more per year over the long run. While the ultimate interest rate, if any, may be determined by an equity index such as the S&P 500, that does not mean the annuity is designed to provide equity type returns.

    2. Don’t ever compare historical (or hypothetical) index annuity returns to historical returns on the S&P 500. Do compare historical returns to historical returns on CDs and traditional fixed annuities.

    This one is really more No. 1a than No. 2, but I thought it was important enough to highlight separately. Given the poor equity performance of the previous decade, it would not be difficult to find a time period where index annuities would have returned more than the S&P 500. However, any such comparison automatically causes the client to view an index annuity as an equity alternative. Sure, such a comparison will make it easier to sell an index annuity, but do you really want to create that expectation in the client’s mind?

    3. If you are recommending an index annuity with a living benefit, don’t overstate the potential income from that benefit. Do make sure the client understands that the income guarantees on the date of issue are the most the client will receive.

    On the day the index annuity with a living benefit is issued, if the client can tell you when she wants to start the income, you can tell her exactly how much she will receive each year for life. That certainty is one of the attractive features of the product. Think of it as a deferred income annuity with more liquidity. Technically, most product designs say that if the account value ever exceeds the income benefit base, the client will get a “step-up” and the income will increase. But let’s be realistic here. Given the cap rates and spreads required by today’s interest rates, the account value will never grow faster than the guaranteed growth in the income base. Therefore, unless you are working with a living benefit design that calculates the income on the account value, rather than the income base, there will not be an increase in income beyond what was guaranteed on Day One of the policy.

    4. Don’t let the client believe that the income benefit base is real money. Do make sure the client understands that the guaranteed growth in the income base is only used to calculate the amount of income and has nothing to do with the return on the policy itself.

    I’m continually amazed at how often we find index annuity policyholders who insist that their policy is guaranteed to return 5%–10% per year. It’s important that you go to great lengths to make sure your clients understand that the income base is not real money. I would suggest you follow the advice of Johnna Chewning, Raymond James’ index annuity product manager, and refer to them as income sky miles. Just as your sky miles are only used to translate into free flights, the income base is only used to calculate guaranteed income.

    Your job on this score would be much easier if the insurance companies would quit putting a dollar sign in front of the income base. After all, the credit card companies don’t put a dollar sign in front of your rewards points. So, for those of you with insurance companies reading this article, please help us out here.

    As I finish writing this, the equity market continues to exhibit volatility and negative short-term performance. While an index annuity might not belong in the 60% sleeve, it is a viable alternative if the client wishes to reduce his equity sleeve from 60% to 50%. It’s also a good alternative if he wants to reduce his interest rate risk within his 40% fixed income sleeve. It’s these two facts that will continue to drive index annuity growth for years to come.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on March 1, 2016 by Scott Stolz, Senior Vice President Raymond James.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency