We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • State Roundup: State of the States – 2015 Year in Review

    February 20, 2016 by PAM HEINRICH

    2015 is “in the books,” with the 2016 legislative sessions just getting underway in most states across the nation. NAFA tracks the legislative and regulatory activity undertaken at the state and federal level, following from introduction to adoption scores of proposed bills and rules that do, or have the potential to, impact the fixed annuity industry. A number of state legislatures carry over introduced bills from one year to the next within a legislative cycle, and, of course, agency activity occurs throughout the calendar year. NAFA is currently tracking approximately 90 “live” proposed bills and regulations across the states and on a wide variety of issues, but, before we get too much deeper into the New Year, let us take a look at some of the new laws and rules that were put into effect in 2015.

    Annuity Disclosure Rule and/or Annuity Buyer’s Guide

    Several states moved to adopt the revised 2011 NAIC Annuity Disclosure Model Rule and/or the updated 2013 NAIC Annuity Buyer’s Guide(s). Maine had been operating under a Maine Bureau of Insurance bulletin since October 2013, which allowed producers to use either the new 2013 Annuity Buyer’s Guide(s) or the 1998 version of the guide. However, on June 5, 2015, the Bureau adopted final amendments to ME Insurance Rule 915, adopting both the 2011 NAIC Annuity Disclosure Model Rule as well as the 2013 NAIC Annuity Buyer’s Guide(s). The new rule went into effect November 1, 2015. And, on April 24, 2015, West Virginia adopted both the updated NAIC Annuity Disclosure Model Regulation and the Annuity Buyer’s Guide(s). For sales of fixed annuities, either the “2013 Buyer’s Guide for Deferred Annuities” or the “2013 Buyer’s Guide for Deferred Annuities – Fixed” can be used. The new rule became effective July 28, 2015; however, the W. VA Insurance Commissioner allowed a phase-in period for compliance with the new rule, but the rule’s provisions became mandatory for all annuity contracts issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2016. Wisconsin has adopted the 2013 NAIC Annuity Buyer’s Guide only. The changes to § Ins 2.15, Wis. Adm. Code, repeal the outdated state-specific guide; however, insurers and agents may continue to use the state-specific guide until March 1, 2016.

    Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact

    California, one of just a handful of states that have not yet joined the Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact, passed California Assembly Bill 387 (Ch. 691) requiring the CA Insurance Commissioner to commission an independent study to examine the extent to which the uniform standards set forth in the IIPRC provide consumer protections that differ from those already established under California law for annuity and other insurance products. The study is to be completed no later than January 1, 2017. (And, Connecticut introduced legislation on February 4, 2016, CT House Bill 5051, to join the Compact. Similar legislation failed in Connecticut in 2015.)

    NARAB II

    In January, Congress finally passed and the President signed into law, ‘NARAB II’ – the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act of 2015. NARAB would function as an independent, non-profit corporation, providing insurance agents and brokers who do business in multiple states a “one-stop” mechanism to satisfy the licensing and other requirements and conditions that exist in their non-resident states. Essentially, membership in NARAB would become the equivalent to a non-resident insurance producer license. However, while NARAB would simplify the licensing process for multi-state producers, states would retain their jurisdiction over producer discipline and supervision, as well as the regulation of the marketplace in their respective state. NARAB will not be part of any federal agency, nor will it receive any federal funding. For a more detailed review of NARAB II, please see the Annuity Outlook March/April magazine, Vol. 4, Issue 2.

    State Run Retirement Savings Plans

    Several states took action in 2015 to create state-run retirement savings programs for certain private sector employees. This is a slow-growing national movement that received a notable push from the federal government in November, when the United States Department of Labor published a notice of proposed rulemaking, along with an Interpretive Bulletin, intended to provide guidance to states as they consider the creation of such programs. In March, Oregon passed HB 2960 (Ch. 557, Laws of 2015), creating the Oregon Retirement Savings Plan and establishing a seven-member Oregon Retirement Savings Board. The Board is directed to create a defined contribution retirement plan for people employed in Oregon. In addition, the Board is directed to conduct market analysis, receive legal guidance, and undertake outreach to small businesses and future plan recipients. Once created, the Plan would be run by a private-sector provider, with a minimum employer role. The law directs the plan to be operational by July 1, 2017; unless it’s determined that the plan would not qualify under ERISA. Meanwhile, Washington enacted SB 5826 (Ch. 296, Laws of 2015), creating the Washington Small Business Retirement Marketplace. The new law authorizes the Director of the Washington Department of Commerce to contract with a private-sector entity to establish a voluntary program that connects eligible employers with qualifying plans. And, a bill that was introduced in New Jersey in 2015 became law in January 2016. The 2015 N.J. Public Law 298 creates the New Jersey Small Business Retirement Marketplace Act. Patterned after Washington’s plan, the New Jersey program is designed to provide private sector small business employees access to retirement plans by creating a voluntary public-private partnership marketplace that will educate small business employers on existing private sector retirement plan vendors, creating a market-based approach to encourage more workers to save for their retirement. The program will be run out of the state’s Department of Treasury, and the NJ State Treasurer is directed to design and implement a plan for the operation of the marketplace. Ultimately, the State Treasurer is charged with approving a diverse array of private retirement plan options that will be available to employers on a voluntary basis, including life insurance plans and products designed for retirement purposes. In addition to these three state program adoptions, Virginia passed legislation (Ch. 669), directing the state’s Secretary of Finance to convene a working group to review current state and federal laws and regulations that encourage citizens to save for retirement by participating in retirement savings plans.

    Suitability in Annuity Transactions

    Three additional states, Georgia, Maine, and Tennessee have adopted the 2010 version (current) of the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation, MDL # 275. With the addition of these three states, a total of 37 states – plus the District of Columbia – have adopted the updated model. Currently, the Massachusetts Division of Insurance is considering its adoption, leaving just twelve states that have not yet adopted the revised model rule. These states are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia.

    Annuity Mortality Tables/Reserve Liabilities

    In 2012, the NAIC amended Model Regulation #821, relating to Annuity Mortality Table for Use in Determining Reserve Liabilities for Annuities, adopting the 2012 Individual Annuity Reserving Table as developed by the Society of Actuaries Committee on Life Insurance Research. Prior to the adoption of the 2012 IAR Table, the generational mortality table had not been updated since 2000. The current model dictates that the 2012 IAR mortality table shall use minimum standard of valuation for any individual annuity issued on or after January 1, 2014. A fair number of states had already adopted this revised model in 2013 and 2014, but many more states adopted the revised model in 2015, adjusting the effective date accordingly, generally to January 1, 2016. The states/jurisdictions that adopted the 2012 IAR Mortality Table in 2015 include: Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. (Currently, Kansas and Pennsylvania are considering adopting the 2012 IAR mortality table.)

    Standard Valuation/Standard Nonforfeiture Model Laws

    NAIC Model Regulations #805 (Standard Nonforfeiture Law for Individual Deferred Annuities – “SNFL”) and #820 (Standard Valuation Law) were revised in 2012/2013 and 2009, respectively. The revised Standard Valuation Law (SVL) introduced a new method for calculating life insurance policy reserves: principle-based reserving (PBR) and included reference to a Valuation Manual, revising insurance and reserving requirements to reflect PBR. The Valuation Manual, in turn, was adopted by the NAIC in December 2012. However, in order for the Valuation Manual to become operational under the Standard Valuation Law, at least 42 states representing 75% of total U.S. premium must adopt the 2009 revisions to SVL. Many states have also chosen to adopt the revised SNFL as part of their implementation of principle-based reserving, but there is no requirement to do so. According to the NAIC, as of November 1, 2015, 39 states, representing 71.2% of U.S. premium, have adopted the revised model laws. It is anticipated that the Valuation Manual will become operative on January 1, 2017, although companies will be allowed a three-year transition time to implement PBR. States that adopted the revised SNFL and/or SVL in 2015 include the following: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, Vermont, and Wisconsin. (To date in 2016, Alabama, Idaho, Massachusetts, and Washington are all considering adoption of the revised SVL.)

    Originally Posted at NAFA Annuity Outlook on February 10, 2016 by PAM HEINRICH.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency