We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC exams pinpoint advisors’ retirement business

    December 30, 2015 by Nick Thornton

    Photo: AP

    Photo: AP

    The Securities and Exchange Commission is making good on the exam priorities it pledged early in 2015.

    One of those priorities was to take a closer look at how registered advisors comply with the Advisors Act when it comes to overseeing their clients’ assets in 401(k) and IRA accounts.

    The SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Exams began on-site examinations at the end of November 2015.

    Those registered advisors selected for this year’s exam sweeps are required to provide detailed information on advisors with retirement-specific titles or professional certifications.

    If government regulators don’t know the difference between competing business models, how can we expect the investing public to?

    Advisors undergoing exams will have to turn over marketing material and sales scripts relating information on 401(k) distribution options for clients.

    Also, advisors will have to prove to SEC examiners how they revealed the costs and potential conflicts of interest relating to clients’ retirement assets, including if or when a rollover of 401(k) assets to an IRA was recommended.

    The SEC is also concerned with how thoroughly registered advisors are breaking out the cost of specific investment options, including nuanced descriptions that go beyond an investment’s expense ratio, including relevant information on revenue sharing, loads, commissions and any other charges.

    Examiners are taking a close look at specialist 401(k) advisors’ business practices as well.

    Those practices will have to break out details on sponsor clients, including amount of plan assets advised.

    All fees earned for those services will have to be divulged, of course, including fees earned via revenue sharing agreements with investment managers.

    Advisor fund managers of qualified default investment alternatives are another area of the retirement industry under review.

    Among other things, the SEC wants to know how participants are being charged for their managed QDIA shares, and what is included in the enrollment disclosures for those investment alternatives.

    In June, the OCIE launched what it’s calling a “multi-year Retirement-Targeted Reviews and Examinations Initiative,” or ReTIRE Initiative.

    The effort comes as the SEC is under increased pressure to make good on the authority it was granted when Dodd Frank was passed in 2010, authorizing the creation of a uniform fiduciary standard for all investment advisors.

    The Department of Labor has promised to finalize its proposed fiduciary rule, and has the strong backing of the Obama White House.

    Opponents of the DOL have called on the SEC to be the lead regulator in creating a uniform fiduciary standard.

    And while SEC Chair Mary Jo White has publicly voiced her support for a fiduciary standard and formally initiated the process of establishing a new rule, she has also cautioned that a rulemaking effort will likely be years in the making.

    Moreover, some industry watchers suggest the politically divisive nature of the SEC’s four commissioners, two of which would have to vote with Chair White to finalize an SEC fiduciary rule, could further delay rulemaking.

    Originally Posted at BenefitsPro on December 30, 2015 by Nick Thornton.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency