We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Effective Communication Is Critical to Retaining Price-Sensitive Individual Life Insurance Customers

    September 24, 2015 by PRNewswire

    State Farm Ranks Highest in Life Insurance Customer Satisfaction

    WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., Sept. 24, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — Communication plays a critical role in satisfaction with individual life insurance providers, yet at least 17 percent of customers who purchased through an agent or financial advisor have never had another interaction with their insurer since their initial purchase, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S. Household Insurance StudySM—Individual Life released today.

    The study, now in its second year, measures individual life insurance customer satisfaction with their insurer based on performance in four factors (in order of importance): price; policy offerings; interaction; and billing and payment. Annualized direct premiums written for the U.S. individual life market are approximately $112 billion.[1] On average, approximately 44 percent of consumers have an individual life insurance policy.[2]

    For more information about J.D. Power insurance studies, visit http://www.jdpower.com/industry/insurance.

    Price is a primary reason consumers shop for individual life insurance products and providers—and also the main reason they let their policy lapse. However, when insurers are able to effectively communicate the value customers receive relative to what they pay, even customers who pay a higher premium are more satisfied and less likely to shop for a new policy with a competing insurer.

    Further, 46 percent of individual life insurance customers don’t have a complete understanding of their policy. Customers who have an agent or financial advisor or company representative who has reached out to them in the past year tend to have a greater understanding of their policy and are also more likely to say they “definitely will” purchase a policy with their current insurer if they need additional life or financial services products in the future, compared with those whose agent or financial advisor or company representative hasn’t reached out to them.

    “Most of the insurers know that communication is important, but they just aren’t doing it,” said Valerie Monet, director of the insurance practice at J.D. Power. “Customer interaction requires a financial commitment from insurers, and they need to see the return on their investment. Interaction can offset a higher price when customers focus their attention on the value of their policy.”

    The study finds that 37 percent of individual life insurance customers have evaluated their life insurance needs, including the relevance of their current product, in the past two years. Yet, nearly 1 in 5 customers who purchase through an agent or financial advisor has never had another interaction with them since their initial policy purchase. Among customers who shopped for a new policy in the past two years[3], 40 percent ultimately upgraded or purchased a new policy from their current insurer, while another 12 percent purchased a new policy with another.

    “As insurance customers enter different stages of their life, the amount of coverage and the products best suited to meet their financial planning goals may also change,” said Monet. “If insurers contact their customers even once a year, they can help them understand their policy and address their needs, and in doing so are more likely to retain them as a customer. If they aren’t talking to their customers, they are giving them a reason to shop around, and they’ll likely go to an insurer with a lower price.”

    KEY FINDINGS

    • Overall satisfaction averages 770 on a 1,000-point scale in 2015, up from 763 in 2014.
    • Overall customer satisfaction averages 775 among Gen Y[4] customers, 772 among Gen X, 765 among Boomers, and 784 among Pre-Boomers.
    • Forty-three percent of customers have a term life insurance policy, while 56 percent have a permanent life insurance policy.
    • Nearly one-third of shoppers are new buyers—either those who are new to the market or who have a lapse policy.
    • Competitive pricing drives a Boomer’s purchase decision more often than it drives a Gen Y shopper’s purchase decision (29% vs. 21%, respectively), whereas Gen Y shoppers rely more on recommendations from family and friends than do Boomers (12% vs. 6%).
    • Among Gen Y customers, providing tools to help calculate coverage is another key area for improving their experience, which may be due to lower levels of understanding of life insurance policies—just 45 percent of Gen Y customers say they “completely” understand their coverage, compared with 64 percent of Pre-Boomers, 44 percent of Gen X, and 55 percent of Boomers.
    • Among customers with higher levels of price satisfaction (price satisfaction scores of 900 or higher) and a higher policy face value ($250,000 or more), 53 percent have been contacted by their insurer at least once during the past year; 48 percent have been informed of other products and services; and 85 percent say they “completely” understand their policy coverage.

    Insurance Rankings
    State Farm ranks highest in individual life insurance customer satisfaction with a score of 823. Northwestern Mutual ranks second with a score of 820, followed by Allstate and Nationwide, each with a score of 801.

    The 2015 Household Insurance Study—Individual Life is based on responses from 6,798 individual life insurance customers. The study was fielded in June and July 2015.

    Overall Customer Satisfaction Index Scores

    J.D. Power.com Power Circle RatingsTM 

    (Based on a 1,000-point scale) 

    For Consumers

    State Farm

    823

    5

    Northwestern Mutual

    820

    5

    Allstate

    801

    4

    Nationwide

    801

    4

    Mutual of Omaha

    791

    4

    New York Life

    791

    4

    Guardian Life

    788

    4

    Life Insurance Industry Average

    770

    3

    MetLife

    769

    3

    Principal Financial

    769

    3

    Protective Life

    765

    3

    Prudential

    755

    3

    MassMutual

    753

    3

    Voya Financial (formerly ING)

    749

    2

    AIG

    748

    2

    AXA Financial

    748

    2

    Transamerica (AEGON)

    748

    2

    Genworth Financial

    747

    2

    Lincoln Financial Group

    738

    2

    John Hancock

    732

    2

    Primerica

    723

    2

    Power Circle Ratings Legend
    5 – Among the best
    4 – Better than most
    3 – About average
    2 – The rest

     

    Award-Eligible Insurance Companies Included in the Study

    Company Name

    CEO Name

    Company Address

    AIG

    Peter Hancock

    New York, N.Y.

    Allstate

    Thomas Wilson

    Northbrook, Ill.

    AXA Financial

    Mark Pearson

    New York, N.Y.

    Genworth Financial

    Thomas McInerney

    Richmond, Va.

    Guardian Life

    Deanna Mulligan

    New York, N.Y.

    John Hancock

    Craig Bromley

    Boston, Mass.

    Lincoln Financial Group

    Dennis Glass

    Radnor, Pa.

    MassMutual

    Roger Crandall

    Springfield, Mass.

    MetLife

    Steven Kandarian

    New York, N.Y.

    Mutual of Omaha

    James Blackledge

    Omaha, Neb.

    Nationwide

    Stephen Rasmussen

    Columbus, Ohio

    New York Life

    Theodore Mathas

    New York, N.Y.

    Northwestern Mutual

    John Schlifske

    Milwaukee, Wisc.

    Primerica

    Glenn Williams

    Duluth, Ga.

    Principal Financial

    Larry Zimpleman

    Des Moines, Iowa

    Protective Life

    John Johns

    Birmingham, Ala.

    Prudential

    John Strangfeld

    Newark, N.J.

    State Farm

    Michael Tipsord

    Bloomington, Ill.

    Transamerica (AEGON)

    Mark Mullin

    Cedar Rapids, Iowa

    USAA

    Stuart Parker

    San Antonio, Texas

    Voya Financial (ING)

    Rodney Martin

    New York, N.Y.

     

    Media Relations Contacts
    Jeff Perlman; Brandware Public Relations; Woodland Hills, Calif.; 818-317-3070; jperlman@brandwarepr.com

    John Tews; Troy, Mich.; 248-680-6218; media.relations@jdpa.com

    About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info
    About McGraw Hill Financial www.mhfi.com 

    [1] A.M. Best 2014 L/H Single Companies Writing Ordinary Life for Total US Direct Premiums Written (DPW).

    [2] Facts About Life 2013. LIMRA International. http://www.limra.com/uploadedFiles/limracom/Posts/PR/LIAM/PDF/Facts-Life-2013.pdf

    [3] Data reflects 2014 and 2015 aggregated for analysis purposes.

    [4]     J.D. Power defines generational groups as Pre-Boomers (born before 1946); Boomers (1946-1964); Gen X (1965-1976); Gen Y (1977-1994); and Gen Z (1995 and later).

     

     

    SOURCE J.D. Power

    RELATED LINKS
    http://www.jdpower.com

    Originally Posted at PRNewswire on September 24, 2015 by PRNewswire.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency