We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,028)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (481)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (826)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (282)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Feds Take Aim At VA Purchases By Seniors

    April 17, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com

    WASHINGTON – The purchase of variable annuities (VAs) by senior investors is the most common area in which noncompliance and nonsuitability issues were found, according to a new report by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

    The report highlights recent industry trends in the investment decisions of senior investors as they prepare for and enter into retirement, as well as the regulatory issues impacting this subset of securities industry customers.

    For example, the report found, areas of noncompliance dealing with VAs included the section of variable annuity forms or disclosure letters describing the comparative fees and benefits between the current and the proposed annuities. The report found these areas often were incomplete.

    In addition, some firms provided what appeared to be inaccurate and misleading disclosures pertaining to VAs. This misleading information included inaccurately disclosing the loss of a death benefit resulting from an exchange or not clearly communicating, inaccurately describing, or failing to disclose surrender charges, the report said.

    The report was based on examinations of 44 broker/dealers in 2013 by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) and FINRA.

    Mutual funds, VAs and equities were the products most often purchased by senior investors, according to the report.

    Seniors also purchased more complex securities, such as unit investment trusts (UITs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), alternative investments and structured products, but such purchases were less frequent, the report said.

    The report found that, based on sales of products to seniors, 77 percent purchased open-end mutual funds, 68 per cent bought mutual funds, 66 percent bought equities, 25 percent bought fixed-income investments, 20 percent bought UITs and exchange-traded funds, and 20 percent bought non-traded REITs.

    The report found that 89 percent of the 44 broker/dealers examined in 2013 made adequate disclosures to seniors regarding a potential transaction, with only 11 percent not in full compliance.

    In addition to noncompliance and nonsuitability issues with VAs, “staff observed what appeared to be inaccurate or incomplete disclosures primarily related to non-traditional securities such as REITs,” the report said.

    Staff also observed what appeared to be inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading disclosures in relation to affiliated private placements and REITs, the report said.

    The report said almost 64 percent of the examined firms allowed their representatives to use senior designations in their sales efforts, and these firms collectively permitted the use of 25 different senior designations. Some firms prohibited the use of senior designations that did not meet certain minimum curriculum and continuing education requirements.

    For example, the report said 64 percent of the designations that firms allowed representatives to use required continuing education for the financial professional to maintain the title, 44 percent of the allowed designations were not recognized by any independent accrediting organization, and almost 30 percent of the firms prohibited titles or designations if the corresponding curriculum and continuing education requirement did not meet certain specified standards.

    Of the 28 firms that allowed senior designations, 14 percent did not track which representatives had a senior designation, which may violate FINRA’s rule on communication with the public, the report said.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on April 16, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency