We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • IUL Illustration Rules Could Be Phased In Starting In Sept.

    March 31, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com

    WASHINGTON – The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has moved a step closer to adopting new rules governing the illustrations to be used in selling indexed universal life insurance (IUL).

    According to the agreement by the NAIC’s Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF), the new rule could be approved as early as April 16 and could be phased in starting Sept. 15.

    Under the proposed phase-in, provisions dealing with currently payable scale methodology, as well as the so-called “guardrail” that limits the expected yield that can be offered investors in IUL, will go into effect Sept. 15.

    Provisions detailing information on policy loans and establishing additional standards will go into effect for all new business and in-force life insurance illustrations on policies sold on or after March 1, 2016.

    The fly in the ointment is New York state. At a hearing held in connection with the NAIC spring meeting in Phoenix, the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) voted to oppose opening the proposed final rule for comment. Further, the DFS said it intended to amend its current life illustration regulation, Regulation 74. New York DFS officials declined to comment.

    Industry officials declined direct comment on New York’s decision, but several privately voiced dismay that the rule potentially could not have a uniform impact.

    Industry actuaries regarded the only changes to the agreement as technical changes.

    The LATF voted to expose the revised proposal for comment until April 14, with the goal of adopting it during its scheduled April 16 conference call.

    At a two-hour meeting March 26, the LATF effectively approved in principle a proposed regulation that represents a compromise agreed to by interested parties March 20.

    Under that proposal, agents would be allowed to show potential customers a document that supported crediting rates in the 6 to 7 percent range, although so-called “guardrails” mandated by the proposal could limit actual likely yields to as low as 4.5 percent. The proposal also puts limits on loan leveraging.

    The LATF did agree to include two suggestions aimed at strengthening the final rule.

    In the first suggestion, the Connecticut Insurance Department proposed language that would mandate additional disclosures. In the second suggestion, Alabama proposed an amendment that would further clarify the already existing obligations of the illustration actuary that deal with the parameters of the proposed index. The proposed amendment would specify that index parameters should include participation rate, cap rate, index load spread rate, index floor rate, index asset charge, and any policy expenses or index risk management charges in direct support of the index investment account that contribute to the calculation of the net index rate for the contract.

    In addition, Alabama wants to include language intended to reduce ambiguity illustration actuaries might exploit through language in Section 8 of the exposure draft. The Alabama proposal also would impose sanctions on actuaries for using loopholes in rule language that lead to misleading interpretations of potential yield to those who purchase IUL.

    Industry officials said they don’t think any of the proposed revisions “will materially change” the proposal.

    Moreover, industry officials said that throughout the meeting, members of the LATF “were quick to ensure” that any suggested revisions to the proposal would not delay the adoption process.

    The American Council of Life Insurers also proposed changes. Representatives of MetLife, Pacific Life, Allianz and New York Life also responded to LATF members request for input, according to several industry representatives.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 30, 2015 by Arthur D. Postal, arthur.postal@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency