We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,028)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (481)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (826)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (282)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • A.M. Best Affirms Ratings of Lincoln National Corporation and Its Key Subsidiaries

    December 10, 2013 by A.M. Best Co.

    OLDWICK, N.J., Nov 22, 2013 (BUSINESS WIRE) — A.M. Best Co. has affirmed the financial strength rating (FSR) of A+ (Superior) and issuer credit ratings (ICR) of “aa-” of the key life/health subsidiaries of Lincoln National Corporation (Lincoln) (headquartered in Radnor, PA) [NYSE: LNC], consisting of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Lincoln Life and Annuity Company of New York (New York, NY) (together known as LNL). Concurrently, A.M. Best has affirmed the ICR of “a-” as well as the existing debt ratings of Lincoln.

    Additionally, A.M. Best has affirmed the FSR of A (Excellent) and ICR of “a+” of Lincoln’s stand-alone subsidiary, First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company. The outlook for all ratings is stable. All companies are domiciled in Fort Wayne, IN, unless otherwise specified. (Please see link below for a detailed listing of the companies and ratings.)

    The ratings of LNL primarily reflect its leadership position across its various business segments, strong and diverse distribution capabilities, good investment performance and solid level of risk-adjusted capital. A.M. Best notes LNL’s overall record in recent years of sustaining and improving profitability, including its continued favorable performance in managing both its universal life with secondary guarantees (ULSG) and variable annuity living benefit liabilities. In addition, LNL’s consistent presence in the variable annuity space has brought some stability to its liability profile as has the increased use of managed risk strategies in the product. A.M. Best believes that the company’s above-average enterprise risk management capabilities are further evidenced through active interest rate management across its product lines and investment portfolio. Overall, A.M. Best believes LNL’s risk-adjusted capital level adequately supports its current balance sheet risks under several stress scenarios.

    A.M. Best notes that LNL’s operating results remain favorable in 2013 as increased earnings in the variable annuity line has offset both an increase in mortality in the ordinary life insurance line as well as the impact of the low interest rate environment on its spread-based businesses. Additionally, LNL’s operating results have been supported by rising equity markets and an uptick in interest rates. While the company’s overall sales remain solid, sales of its core MoneyGuard product have moderated. LNL continues to face ongoing challenges from competition in its core businesses in addition to market volatility due to its high proportion of interest and equity-sensitive liabilities. Moreover, although the company utilizes a robust hedging strategy, its legacy books of ULSG and variable annuities continue to provide a source of risk with respect to ongoing reserve funding and overall operating volatility.

    LNL retains a substantial amount of life insurance and annuity account values with credited rates that are currently close to or at minimum guarantees. A.M. Best notes that the organization continues to utilize captives to fund Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX (AG38) reserves and to help smooth earnings volatility driven by its hedging activity for variable annuities. LNL’s group protection and retirement plans services segments continue to provide only modest contributions to consolidated earnings, although the segments are profitable and provide some diversification to the enterprise.

    A.M. Best notes the continued favorable performance of LNL’s investment portfolio despite the slight shift in allocation to higher-yielding assets. A.M. Best believes the organization’s exposure to riskier structured securities and commercial mortgages remains manageable. Moreover, LNL currently maintains excess liquidity throughout its organization, which acts as a buffer for any potential adverse experience.

    Lincoln’s financial leverage and interest coverage ratios remain within A.M. Best’s expectations for its current ratings, and its overall financial flexibility is good. A.M. Best notes that the persistent low interest rate environment continues to impact pre-tax operating earnings, but this headwind is somewhat mitigated by the current level of excess cash maintained at the holding company–approximately $500 million, net of a prefunded early 2014 debt maturity.

    A.M. Best believes the ratings for Lincoln and its subsidiaries are well positioned for the foreseeable future. Future negative rating actions could result from a substantial decline in the group’s risk-adjusted capital, deteriorating operating results or a material increase in overall investment risk.

    For a complete listing of Lincoln National Corporation and its subsidiaries’ FSRs, ICRs and debt ratings, please visit www.ambest.com/press/112204lincoln.pdf .

    The methodology used in determining these ratings is Best’s Credit Rating Methodology, which provides a comprehensive explanation of A.M. Best’s rating process and contains the different rating criteria employed in the rating process. Best’s Credit Rating Methodology can be found at www.ambest.com/ratings/methodology .

    A.M. Best Company is the world’s oldest and most authoritative insurance rating and information source. For more information, visit www.ambest.com .

    Copyright (C) 2013 by A.M. Best Company, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    SOURCE: A.M. Best Co.

    Originally Posted at MarketWatch on November 22, 2013 by A.M. Best Co..

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency