We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,052)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (282)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • LPL hit with largest Finra fine ever for e-mail case

    May 22, 2013 by Bruce Kelly

    Brokerage agrees to pay $7.5M to settle charges it failed to adequately oversee 28 million e-mails over a four-year period

    Finra said today that it has fined LPL $7.5 million for 35 separate significant e-mail system failures.

    What’s more, LPL Financial LLC made misstatements to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. during its investigation of the failures. LPL also was ordered to create a $1.5 million fund to compensate brokerage customers potentially affected by its failure to produce e-mail.

    “This is the largest fine Finra has imposed for an e-mail case,” said Finra spokeswoman Michelle Ong.

    LPL’s e-mail review and retention problems occurred from 2007 to 2013, and its systems failed at least 35 times, according to Finra. The firm was unable to meet its obligations to capture e-mail, supervise its reps and respond to requests from regulators.

    In concluding the settlement, LPL neither admitted nor denied the charges.

    “In September 2011, we reported to Finra issues relating to the surveillance and retention of e-mails,” LPL said in a statement. “We cooperated fully with Finra throughout its ensuing investigation. We very much regret our lapse of oversight. We have undertaken a comprehensive redesign of our e-mail systems and associated compliance policies and procedures, and have engaged independent experts to assess and validate our approach.”

    Over a four-year period, LPL failed to supervise 28 million “doing business as” e-mails sent and received by thousands of reps who were working as independent contractors, Finra said.

    In response, LPL said in its statement: “Finra’s action identified that certain LPL personnel had information that would have uncovered the DBA issue earlier than senior management was aware, and we have taken steps to train our employees on escalating compliance issues.”

    It is the second time this year that LPL has faced significant charges about compliance and oversight of its brokers and systems.

    In February, the firm said it had paid a $500,000 fine and set aside $2 million in restitution to Massachusetts investors who bought nontraded real estate investment trusts from LPL brokers. The Massachusetts Securities Division had filed a complaint against LPL in December that involved investors who bought shares of several REITs in violation of state limitations, as well as the company’s own rules and procedures

    LPL, which has 13,000 registered reps and advisers, had its initial public offering in 2010 after a decade of rapid growth. Broker-dealers that grow at a breakneck pace often fall prey to compliance problems, as a rapidly growing sales force can overwhelm resources devoted to oversight and compliance.

    Finra said that’s what happened to LPL. “As LPL rapidly grew its business, the firm failed to devote sufficient resources to update its e-mail system, which became increasingly complex and unwieldy for LPL to manage and monitor effectively,” Finra said in a statement. “The firm was well-aware of its e-mail systems’ failures and the overwhelming complexity of its systems.”

    On the sidelines of Finra’s annual conference in Washington today, Finra chairman and chief executive Rick Ketchum reiterated that point and said that the LPL case was not a shot across the bow of independent broker dealers. Rather, it was a matter of LPL growing too quickly and not being able to implement adequate technology and supervision controls to keep up with its rapidly expanding network of brokers.

    “It doesn’t suggest that there’s something inherently flawed with the independent-contractor model,” Mr. Ketchum told reporters. “This is a case where they got over their own skis from the standpoint of the expansion that occurred.”

    Mr. Ketchum said that he has “a great deal of respect” for LPL and that the firm has a “great deal of integrity.”

    There can be problems associated with all investment-advisory models — and they’ve all gotten into trouble, Mr. Ketchum said.

    “It’s a big risk when you’re expanding very quickly — and that, I think, is the message today,” Mr. Ketchum said.

    LPL chief executive, Mark Casady, who a member of Finra’s board of governors, highlighted the e-mail surveillance issue April 25 in a call with Wall Street analysts who cover the company. LPL “recorded an expense related to the expected settlement of the Finra matter in the company’s financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2013,” the company statement said. “Therefore, the company does not anticipate any related charges in its operating results for the current quarter.”

    Reuters reported Monday that LPL was overhauling its compliance procedures in the aftermath of the recent regulatory complaints. The firm has added 137 people to its compliance staff over the past two years, according to the report, which cited LPL’s president Robert Moore.

    (Mark Schoeff Jr. contributed reporting for this article)

    Originally Posted at InvestmentNews on May 21, 2013 by Bruce Kelly.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency