We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,049)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (282)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • ELNY liquidation expected in 3Q

    May 16, 2013 by Elizabeth Festa

    News added by National Underwriter on May 15, 2013

    The Executive Life of New York (ELNY) liquidation plan approved in New York is now expected to be implemented in the third quarter of this year, perhaps as early as August, but the plaintiffs’ lawyer says he is not giving up the case, at least on breach of fiduciary duty.
    New York’s highest court ruled to not hear the case seeking to prevent the plan or restructuring of the failed life insurance company. This cleared the way for liquidation to begin, including activating the participating insurers in the state guaranty funds, pledging more than $100 million to a special hardship fund, and topping off state guaranty funds and covering “orphan contracts” in states where ELNY was not licensed.
    The National Organization of Life & Health Guaranty Funds (NOLGHA) said it is pleased with the decision that all challenges to the liquidation restructuring plan have been removed, and is looking at a third quarter unwinding of the estate.
    ELNY was brought under rehabilitation by the New York Insurance Department in 1991 after its parent company in California was seized by regulators there. Some New York regulators said they feared a run on the company even though ELNY was not insolvent at the time. It is believed it slipped into insolvency after more than a decade of caretaking by the New York Liquidation Bureau sometime in 2002.
    Edward Stone has warned his clients, the shortfall policyholders who will not get the full amount of their annuities, that benefit reductions will begin to occur soon.
    The New York Court of Appeals decision, “while not entirely unexpected, is likely to result in benefit cuts to the shortfall victims of approximately $920 million,” Stone said.
    He is going to try and overturn a contempt order against his firm and the firm of Christensen & Jensen for a class action lawsuit filed on Nov. 8, 2012, in Federal Court in New York against the Superintendent of Financial Services Benjamin Lawsky (and his predecessors) in their personal capacity, MetLife and Credit Suisse for breach of fiduciary duty and other causes of action arising out of the alleged mismanagement of the ELNY rehabilitation, and an alleged subsequent cover-up.
    On Jan. 25th, 2013, Nassau County presiding judge on the ELNY case, Judge John M. Galasso, held the victims and their attorneys in civil contempt for filing the federal class action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York.
    The actual ELNY Restructuring Agreement was signed by Galasso in April 2012.
    Stone believes it is a constitutional issue – the state court cannot dismiss a federal complaint — and will take this suit to the Supreme Court, if necessary, but not the appeal itself of the restructuring plan.
    Stone’s first stop is the Appellate Division, second Department.
    If we get shut down by the Appellate Division, we will appeal to the Court of Appeals, Stone stated.
    “We plan to perfect our appeal of the contempt order issued by Judge Galasso in response to the Superintendent’s motion to enforce what he terms ‘anti-suit injunctions.’  We hope that the Appellate Division will uphold United States Supreme Court precedent as articulated in Donovan vs. City of Dallas,” Stone said.
    In that legal case, the court noted, “early in the history of our country, a general rule was established that state and federal courts would not interfere with or try to restrain each other’s proceedings.”
    Galasso found the legal teams in contempt for “filing an action in federal court” and threatened further fines, making specific reference to “a motion to dismiss the federal complaint.”
    “The fact that the Superintendent used ELNY assets to get Galasso to issue a patently unlawful and improper order confirms our suspicions that something is very seriously wrong with the receivership process in New York,” Stone alleged. He acknowledged it might take some time but said he was in it for the long haul.
    Stone accused Lawsky and the New York Department of Financial Services of an alleged attempt to retaliate against the ELNY shortfall payees “by filing what amounts to a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suit intended to intimidate the ELNY shortfall payees into withdrawing the federal class action lawsuit,” he alleged.
    The DFS did not comment on the legal actions and the clearance for the restructuring to proceed by presstime. The three insurers who helped create the hardship fund with Lawsky, MetLife, Prudential Insurance and New York Life, also did not comment.   NOLGHA said it is pleased with the decision that all challenges to the liquidation restructuring plan have been removed.
    Since the ruling, NOLHGA has been coordinating with the New York Liquidation Bureau and the American Council of Life Insurance (ACLI) (on behalf of the 39 life insurance companies who are voluntarily supporting the Restructuring Plan) to address the remaining technical components and implement the Restructuring Plan, which was approved by the lower court over a year ago, it stated.
    “The industry’s voluntary enhancements to the restructuring plan will now come into play and help those affected by the company’s liquidation.”
    The Hardship Fund, voluntarily established by the life insurance industry and independently administered by JAMS, is preparing now to help those people most affected by the ELNY liquidation, ACLI spokesman Jack Dolan stated.
    “We are pleased the resolution of ELNY can now move forward without further delay.  The industry’s voluntary enhancements to the Restructuring Plan will now come into play and help those affected by the company’s liquidation,” Dolan continued.
    Stone figures the shortfall payees are not going to be made whole, despite the hardship fund.
    “For more than 21 years, victims have been kept in the dark while assets set aside to provide for their long-term needs were squandered under the superintendent’s watch,” Stone wrote.
    “Before filing the class action lawsuit, we asked the Superintendent to look into the single largest failed effort at ‘rehabilitation’ in the history of the State of New York and he refused,” Stone stated.
    Originally published on LifeHealthPro.com

    Originally Posted at ProducersWeb on May 15, 2013 by Elizabeth Festa.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency