We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Valuation of Marketing Organizations

    March 1, 2013 by Sheryl J. Moore

    The past four or five years have been a major struggle for distributors in the life insurance business. The collapse of our nation’s economy, while catastrophic, was only the first domino in a vast Rube Goldberg Machine of economic destruction. Capital became scarce as the smoke cleared, causing insurance companies to pull back on their product offerings. The resulting mismatch between the supply and demand of fixed and indexed annuities was frustrating; never before was there such a demand for the products, but there were so few companies that wanted the business. Shortly thereafter, interest rates began a rapid downward plunge. The ten-year treasury, a major benchmark for pricing fixed and indexed annuities, fell from just over 4.25% in mid-2008, to a low of just under 1.50% a mere four years later. As a result, fixed annuity rates dropped from an average rate of 5.43% to 1.51% over the same period.

    This chain of events has resulted in many Field Marketing Organizations (FMOs) questioning why they are still in this business. Surprisingly, it’s not the aforementioned obstacles that have many marketing organization principals the most concerned. There are other, more frightening, issues that have countless FMOs searching for an exit strategy. First, shrinking spreads are compounding the struggles we’ve discussed. Secondly, proprietary product has changed the fixed and indexed annuity industry — dramatically.

    So what gives with the shrinking spreads? Marketing organizations perform many functions that the home office performs in a traditional career agency system, in order to provide economies of scale from a product manufacturing and distribution standpoint. Instead of the home office hiring folks to handle recruiting, contracting, continuing education, marketing, sales ideas, and more – they simply outsource it to a third-party expert – the FMO. In exchange for performing these services, the FMO earns an override commission on the sales of the agents that submit business through the firm.

    But, how is it that an FMO can attract one of the estimated 1.2 million licensed life and health-licensed insurance agents doing business in this country, when there are about 300 different FMOs for this agent to choose from? What can any one FMO offer the agent, to entice him/her to appoint with their firm, rather than with their competitors?

    How about a higher commission? This seems the quickest and easiest way; just share some of the FMO override commission with the street level insurance agent. This will increase the commission the agent is getting paid, and in theory, the FMO will still come out of it okay. Although the override commission that the FMO takes will be less, their production will be heightened because their street level commission is higher than the next guys; so, they’ll recruit more agents, attain higher overall production, and hit bonus compensation levels. This all compensates for the lower override. Right?

    Well, it sounds good…but if sales don’t increase, and the FMO doesn’t reach their bonus levels, then what? What if the FMO next door decides to do the same exact thing? Then, you are right back where you started. And let’s get real…

    aren’t we all about back where we started?

    This has become a prevalent practice; to the point where nearly every FMO is passing-down overrides to the street level agent. Now the sales aren’t so hot, because products are less competitive and the profit/spread that the FMO is making is on the decline. This is a scary thing. You’d be surprised how many marketing group principals are dealing with potential staff layoffs today. Some haven’t had a raise in several years. Others are just holding-on to hope, praying that the rates will improve dramatically overnight. (However, don’t hold your breath.)

    Meanwhile, proprietary indexed annuity products have also posed a problem for many FMOs. These products, which are available to only an exclusive handful of marketing organizations, have dramatically changed the recruiting and sales landscape of the annuity business. If the FMO can’t pass-down override commissions to attract new agents, offering a seemingly-more competitive product (that few others can offer) may result in a recruiting lottery. Typically, these exclusive product arrangements have a ton of money thrown into the marketing of the product. Shiny bright objects get the street level agent’s attention…until the FMO in the proprietary product arrangement is able to recruit the agent because their product is [simpler, better, more profitable, prettier, you get the idea].

    Before, these products were few and far between. However, the challenges above have resulted in most FMO’s searching out insurance companies to partner with on exclusive product agreements. In mid-2008, only 5% of all indexed annuity products were proprietary in nature; today 13% of all indexed annuities are. But let’s talk about the numbers that really count, okay? Back then, just over 5% of all indexed annuity sales went to these exclusive products; today this share has increased to nearly 19% of sales. Translation: agents are flocking to the very few FMOs that can offer such products, leaving the vast majority of FMOs out in the cold.

    As a result of these challenges, many FMOs have started looking for ways to sell-out. Goodness knows there are plenty of buyers: there are insurance companies with owned distribution, private equity firms have come into the mix over the past couple of years, and some more-profitable organizations have enough money in their pockets to snatch-up their competitors. The problem is these principals struggle to agree with their prospective purchaser on the valuation of the business; the multiples that these FMOs want in the sale are typically far too high. (Logical, as it’s an emotional decision, and how do you put a price on “your baby?”) For those that have taken the current economic environment into consideration, and put their emotions in-check, compromises have been made. Many FMOs have been acquired over the past few years. In fact, a long-time colleague just came to an agreement to sell his shop last month. I never thought he would sell-out. Then again, he was spooked about being left “in the dust,” having no proprietary product to offer…I should have seen it coming.

    So, what can you do if you are one of those FMOs that are nervous or getting very close to being nervous, if you don’t want to sell? How can you stick it out, and still be head-above-water, once the storm clears? Develop some proprietary software system? Offer a lead generation program to your agents? Or maybe even develop a “unique” mentoring program?

    NO!

    This isn’t the answer! Your competitors can do the same thing tomorrow, and then you are right back to where you started again. Your organization needs a TRUE value proposition. You need something where your agents won’t leave because your competitor offers them 0.05% higher commission on the product they’re selling with you. You need a silver bullet!

    My advice on this matter is twofold:

    First, diversify your organization in terms of product lines offered. Don’t be an “annuity shop.” Offer other products: life insurance, long term care, disability income insurance, Medicare supplement plans, etc. Sure, these other products don’t pay as quick, and you have to put more work into your recruiting efforts because the products are more complicated to train-on. However, the low interest rate environment isn’t hitting other insurance types nearly as hard as it’s hitting fixed and indexed annuities. Plus, the less transactional your agents are, the less likely they’ll be to leave when they get offered a sweeter payout by your peer.

    Second and most importantly, be cognizant of what your marketing organizations’ ONE TRUE VALUE PROPOSITION IS: relationships. I don’t care what your “lure” to the agent is: product, software, systems, cash…that can all be duplicated. But how do you replace the lasting, meaningful, personal relationship that comes with nurturing an agent and being vested in his/her business. If you focus on the relationships, you may be emulated, but you’ll never be duplicated.

    This being said, I’d be interested to know – what is the value of YOUR marketing organization? Your multiple may be a little too high. A potential buyer may come-in too low.

    Ask your agents. Their response is the only one that really counts.

    Sheryl Moore is President and CEO of Moore Market Intelligence, an indexed product resources in Des Moines, Iowa. She has over a decade of experience working with indexed products and provides competitive intelligence, market research, product development, consulting services and insight to select financial services companies. She may be reached at sjm@indexdrockstar.com

    Originally Posted at NAFA Annuity Outlook on March 2013 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency