We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • De-Risking DB Pensions Moves Into Higher Gear

    March 26, 2013 by Cyril Tuohy

    Paying out a one-time lump-sum to retirees to trim the risk of defined benefit pension plans – a move known as “de-risking” — is growing in favor in 2013 as companies look to shrink liabilities.

    That’s the conclusion of a survey of 230 U.S. employers by the benefits consulting firm Aon Hewitt. “There’s no question, employers are looking for new ways to aggressively manage their pension volatility,” Rob Austin, senior retirement consultant at Aon Hewitt, said in a statement.

    In 2012, Austin said, many defined benefit plan sponsors were exploring options and planning lump-sum payment strategies. This year will be the year when “many more actually implement large-scale actions such as offering lump-sum windows,” Austin said.

    Pressure has been building for months. Last April, Ford Motor Co. said it would offer 90,000 U.S. salaried retirees and former employees the option to take their monthly pension benefit as a lump-sum payment. In October, General Motors Co. revealed that it had spent $3.6 billion on pension buyouts for white-collar retirees as part of a plan to cut its global pension liability.

    Other big companies have followed suit. They include Sears Holding, NCR Corp., Energy Future Holdings, Archer Daniels Midland, Thomson Reuters, New York Times Co., Visteon Corp., Yum! Brands, Equifax and A.H. Belo, according to a list compiled by one pension and investment publication.

    In October, Verizon Communications also announced it would transfer more than $7.5 billion in benefit liabilities to Prudential, a disputed move now making its way through the courts.

    Matt Herrmann, leader of the retirement risk management group at Towers Watson, said that under a lump-sum arrangement, employees have options. They can stay in the plan, or they can take the pension asset and invest it themselves.

    “There’s a mutual benefit,” said Herrmann, in an interview with InsuranceNewsNet. “It’s only an option for plan sponsors to offer to employees. Employees are not required to take it. The employees can take it and manage it themselves for retirement.”

    Towers Watson acted as an advisor to “about two-thirds” of the defined benefit plans that took action last year in offering lump sums, Herrmann said.

    The Aon Hewitt survey, “2013 Hot Topics in Retirement,” found that 39 percent of defined benefit plan sponsors were either “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to offer terminated vested participants and retirees a lump-sum payout during a specified period – the so-called window approach.

    By contrast, seven percent of defined benefit plan sponsors added a lump-sum window for terminated vested participants and retirees last year.
    Moves to de-risk exposures have become more affordable following passage of the Pension Reform Act of 2006, Herrmann said.

    The de-risking strategies have also helped companies gain control over pension plan volatility in an era of falling interest rates, which cause estimated payouts to balloon while reducing the earnings of fixed-income portions of a pension’s portfolio. Other companies, looking at the low borrowing costs, have taken advantage of the very low rates to borrow large sums which they then contribute to their pensions, Austin said.

    While only 23 percent of defined benefits plan respondents were either “very likely,” or “somewhat likely” to gather annuity purchase bids from insurance companies as a method of preparing to deal with lump sum distributions, the survey revealed a potential opportunity for advisors.

    More companies are expected to outsource, or co-source the administration of their defined benefit plans in 2013, the survey found. A total of 85 percent said they would be likely to adopt an outsourced or co-sourced approach to plan administration within two years, up five percent from the current approach, the survey found.

    Conversely, in-house administration of defined benefit plans, a strategy favored by 20 percent of the survey respondents, will drop by five percentage points in two years, the survey found.

    Cyril Tuohy is a writer living in Pennsylvania. He has covered the financial services industry for more than 15 years. He has also written about food, restaurants and travel. He can be reached at Cyril.tuohy@innfeedback.com.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 25, 2013 by Cyril Tuohy.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency