We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • LPL ordered to pay $2M in restitution

    February 7, 2013 by Bruce Kelly

    After announcing this morning that it posted record revenue in 2012 but failed to boost profits, LPL Financial LLC was hit with an order by Massachusetts Security Division to pay restitution of more than $2 million to investors who bought shares of nontraded real estate investment trusts.

     

    Massachusetts regulators also hit LPL with a $500,000 administrative fine over the matter, which involved investors who bought shares of several different nontraded REITs in violation of state limitations, and the company’s own rules and procedures.

     

    LPL also has agreed to review all nontraded REITs sold in Massachusetts and offered to make restitution to all other investors who bought the securities in violation of state limits or company rules.

     

    “LPL worked cooperatively with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to appropriately resolve all of the issues raised and we are glad to put this matter behind us,” said company spokeswoman Betsy Weinberger. “Under the terms of the consent agreement, certain customers, at their discretion, will have an opportunity to sell their shares of non-traded REITs to LPL or its designee for the price they originally paid.”

     

    LPL Financial and Ameriprise Financial Inc. are the two biggest sellers of nontraded REITs, accounting for almost 20% of the industry’s annual sales of $10 billion. Regulators recently have put the nontraded REITs on close watch as a number of the largest REITs have suffered sharp devaluations.

     

    Earlier Wednesday, LPL Financial’s parent company, LPL Financial Holdings Inc., reported record revenue in 2012 of $3.66 billion, an increase of 5.2% compared with a year earlier. That did not translate, however, into an increase in profit for the year. The company reported a year-over-year decrease in net income, to $151.9 million, a drop of 10.8%.

     

    LPL told its 13,000 registered reps and investment advisers last month that it was planning to cut jobs in the second half of the year and continue its move to outsourcing. The company’s filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission did not detail the specific number of layoffs among its 2,900 employees.

     

    However, the company stated that it expects total charges in connection with the program of $70 million to $75 million to complete the layoffs and outsourcing, which the company stated will not affect any workers who communicate directly with advisers.

     

    In a conference call with investors and analysts on Wednesday morning, CEO Mark Casady said the areas LPL was looking at for outsourcing included: commissions processing, account openings and transfers, document imaging and processing work within compliance and finance.

     

    When asked if the company expected states other than Massachusetts to examine the firm’s sale practices of REITs, Mr. Casady said: “We will work with any state that may raise an issue,” as well with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

     

    “We are in a business that is highly regulated,” Mr. Casady said. “It’s easy to imagine expecting additional inquiries or discussions with other regulatory bodies because that’s the nature of our business.”

     

    For the quarter, LPL’s earnings outperformed analysts’ estimates. The company reported earnings of $0.50 per share, $0.02 better than the Capital IQ consensus estimate of $0.48.

     

    In an interview Wednesday morning, LPL’s chief financial officer Dan Arnold said that recent acquisitions and a $10 million increase in recruiting costs to transition brokers weighed on the company’s earnings. The company continues to recruit registered reps and advisers at a strong pace, adding 182 net new advisers in the fourth quarter and 505 in 2012. The company also repurchased $199 million of its stock in the last three months of the year. At noon on Wednesday, shares of LPL Financial were down $0.71 and trading at $32.57.

     

    Mr. Arnold also said the company had not yet determined the specific number of employees to be affected by the job cuts and outsourcing plan. The change will be completed in 2015 and result in savings of between $30 million and $35 million, he said.

     

    In its consent order with Massachusetts regulators, LPL admitted to a series of statements of fact around the sales of the REITs but neither admitted nor denied allegations stemming from the training and oversight of sales of nontraded REITs as well as alleged violations of securities laws.

     

    According to the statement of fact section of the order, LPL reps sold nontraded REITs in excess of Massachusetts maximum concentration limits imposed by the prospectuses of REITs for 33 residents. The REIT sales occurred between 2006 and 2009. Last summer, the firm began tightening its policies around such REIT sales after being contacted by Massachusetts regulators.

     

    Massachusetts alleged that LPL’s training and oversight of nontraded REIT sales were insufficient

    Originally Posted at InvestmentNews on February 6, 2013 by Bruce Kelly.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency