We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,062)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (485)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (373)
  • Wink's Inside Story (283)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • FINRA Rejects A New York State Of Mind When It Comes To New Jersey Annuity Signatures

    May 11, 2012 by Bill Singer

    5/09/2012 @ 8:20AM |1,058 views

    In response to the filing of a Complaint on January 12, 2012, by the Department of Enforcement of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Respondent Robert Joseph Kennedy III submitted an Offer of Settlement dated April 24, 2012, which the regulator accepted. Under the terms of the Offer of Settlement, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, Respondent Kennedy consented to the entry of findings and violations and to the imposition of the sanctions.FINRA Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs Robert Joseph Kennedy, Respondent (Offer of Settlement, 2009019069101, May 7, 2012).

    According to the Offer of Settlement, Kennedy first became registered with FINRA as an Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Representative (“IR”) in 1984 and during the relevant time of August 1, 2003 through February 26, 2009, was registered as a General Securities Representative (“GSR”) and IR through FINRA member firm Walnut Street Securities, Inc.

    The Offer of Settlement found that between August 2004 and December 2004, Kennedy sold to six Walnut Street customers annuities that were not authorized for sale by the state of New York – although a sale could be consummated with a New York resident provided that the transaction was executed outside of the state and so evidenced by the customer’s signature. FINRA alleged that Kennedy falsified six deferred equity indexed and fixed annuity sales applications by recording or causing to be recorded New Jersey as the state where the customers executed the signatures on the sales applications, although the signatures actually were executed in New York.

    FINRA alleged that Kennedy’s conduct violated NASD Conduct Rule 2110. In accordance with the Offer of Settlement, FINRA imposed the sanctions of :

    • $5,000 fine;
    • two (2) month suspension from association with any member of FINRA in      any and all capacities; and
    • requalification by examination as a General Securities Representative      (GSR) within sixty (60) days of re-entry following the suspension.

    Bill Singer’s Comment

    Neither a profound nor particularly complicated case; however, the landscape of annuities transactions is one upon which Wall Street’s regulators are heavily treading. In this FINRA case, Kennedy could have finalized the subject transactions if he had gotten the clients to physically sign the documents in New Jersey — rather than pretending that they were signed in that state when, in fact, the executions took place in New York. Of course, that’s a bit of a simplification because Kennedy would still have needed to fully disclose the purpose of the circumvention to his clients and also needed his firm’s approval, but such compliance “winks” are common and often suggested by the employer firm.

    I report about this case in order to issue a warning to all registered persons: Your firm may tell you that it’s okay to fudge the technicalities of the how, when, and where of getting your client’s signature or your pals around the office water cooler may tell you that everyone does it. All well and fine. In fact, Kennedy now has the luxury of a two-month suspension to contemplate all the wonderful advice he may (or may not) have gotten; plus, he also has the lovely privilege of forking over $5,000 to FINRA and studying for another round of Series 7.

    Annuities, in all their various iterations and glory, have become big business and are among the mainstay offerings from such major financial services firms as Allianz, Aviva, AXA, ING, John Hancock, Lincoln Financial, MetLife, Prudential, New York Life, and Pacific Life. Of course, along with this status as a popular product being pushed by financial services professionals (in large part related to the fees earned by such promoters) comes increasing numbers of customer lawsuits alleging fraud, forgery, and the panoply of such litigation.

    For some excellent guidance on the pluses and minuses of variable annuities, see this recent posting: SEC Publishes Superb Consumer Guide: Variable Annuities: What You Should Know (“BrokeAndBroker” May 7, 2012).

    Originally Posted at Forbes on May 9, 2012 by Bill Singer.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency